000			01268nam a22003017a 4500
999			_c6424 _d6424
001			6424
003			ES-MaCNC
005			20181126094334.0
008			180622b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
020			_a9781509912759 _qHB
020			_a9781509912735 _qePDF
020			_a9781509912742 _qePub
040			_aES-MaCNC _cES-MaCNC
100	1		_aBurke, Jarleth M. _97290
245	1	2	_aA critical account of Article 106(2) TFEU _b: goverment failure in public service provision. _cJarleth M. Burke
260			_aOxford [UK] _aPortland, Oregon _bHart Publishing _c2018
300			_a218 p. _c24 cm.
336			_2isbdcontent _aTexto (visual)
337			_2isbdmedia _asin mediación
490			_a Hart Studies in Competition Law
500			_aIncludes bibliograhical references and index
520			_aA Critical Account of Article 106(2) TFEU: Government Failure in Public Service Provision offers a sceptical perspective on how EU law applies to public services. Article 106(2) provides that other Treaty rules may be disapplied in order to sustain a Service of General Economic Interest (SGEI). The rhetorical presentation of Article 106(2) is as a strict exception. As a result, Article 106(2) is often presented as a threat to Europe's public service tradition. This book challenges those shibboleths by using the concept of government failure. It is concerned with instances of government intervention that are unnecessary, generate avoidable inefficiencies, or that can be bettered so as to realise general interest goals more efficaciously. As an element of the government failure critique, a market feasibility test incorporating the concept of market failure is used to expose laxity in the review of general interests under Article 106(2). Complementing that, the process of disapplying other Treaty rules under Article 106(2) is shown to have evolved from being strict to being highly indulgent of SGEI providers, with a relatively recent but only partial correction post Altmark. Overall, the strict exception label for Article 106(2) does not hold. Moreover, it is contingent and presents no legitimate general interest related threat to the organisation and delivery of public services. A comprehensive re-orientation of Article 106(2) on issues of proof is required, as is greater reliance on market counterfactuals, and much more careful separation of objectives and means in SGEI operation and design. Through these measures, the toleration of government failure can be stemmed and Article 106(2)'s contingency reduced.
650		4	_aDerecho _9332
650		4	_aRegulación _91079
653		0	_aServicio público
856	4	1	_zVer índice _uhttp://bibliotecacnmc.bage.es/cgi-bin/koha/opac-retrieve-file.pl?id=5508590d7b8469ec52dd7447d3606913
942			_2udc _cMON